👋 Hello {{first name | DistillED reader!}}
In this edition of ⚗️DistillED, we're looking at precorrections — the short, planned reminder you give students just before a moment you already know is likely to go wrong, instead of managing it after it does.
Before we jump in… Do you know, there's a new DistillED Community? It's a space to keep the conversation going after each edition — ask questions, share what's working in your classroom, and swap practice with other evidence-informed teachers. Click the button below to get involved.
In this edition
📊 Do Now: Quick Poll!
When do you find yourself correcting behaviour most often?
What is a Precorrection?
Precorrection is a quick, planned reminder of expected behaviour, delivered just before a moment you already know tends to go wrong. It is not a warning, or a rule on the wall, but a prompt timed to land right before the trouble spot.
The term comes from Geoff Colvin, George Sugai, and Bill Patching (1993), who noticed something teachers already do instinctively with academic errors but rarely do with behaviour. When a student keeps making the same maths mistake, we don't just keep correcting it after the fact — we reteach the rule before they attempt the next problem. Colvin, Sugai, and Patching's insight was simple: if behaviour is learned the same way academic skills are learned, it can be prevented the same way too.
Correction is reactive — it responds to a behaviour after it has happened.
Precorrection is proactive — it responds to a pattern before the behaviour has the chance to occur again.
Both have their place in the classroom. But when a behaviour is predictable because it happens at the same time, during the same transition, or in response to the same task, correction alone often just repeats the cycle. Precorrection helps prevent it because a precorrection is built from a pattern you've actually noticed — not a script you'd say to any class, every time — here's what that looks like for speech in everyday lessons:
Before Paired Discussion: A class that's fallen into talking over partners hears, right before pairs start: "Last time, half the room was talking at once — this time, one voice, and if your partner's speaking, you're listening, not planning what you'll say next."
Before Whole-Class Questioning: In a class where the same few hands always go up, before questions begin: "Today I'm picking names from anyone who hasn't answered yet this lesson — so even if I don't get to you, have your answer ready."
Before a Seminar-Style Debate: For a group whose debates have turned personal before, just before it starts: "Last time this got heated — today, challenge the idea, not the person, and wait for a gap before you jump in."
👉 This is the same instructional lens the edition on Classroom Transitions applies to the moments between activities.
In typical ⚗️DistillED fashion, here's what precorrection is — and what it isn't:
👎 A Precorrection IS NOT:
A Warning or a Threat — "If you do that again..." is a consequence dressed up as a reminder. Precorrection names the expected behaviour positively, before anything has gone wrong
A Rule Posted on the Wall — A general classroom rule is static and untimed. Precorrection is specific, spoken, and delivered in the seconds before the risky moment
A One-Off Fix — A single reminder rarely changes an established pattern. Precorrection works as part of a short plan, used consistently until the new behaviour is fluent
The Same as Front Loading — Front loading (a phrase coined by Adam Boxer) restructures how any instruction is phrased — Means of Participation before content. Precorrection targets a specific pattern you've already noticed going wrong
👍 A Precorrection IS:
Built From What You Already Know — It only works because you've noticed a pattern — the same behaviour, in the same context, on a predictable basis
Timed Deliberately — The reminder is given in the window just before the risky moment, not generically at the start of the day or lesson
Positive in Focus — It names the expected behaviour, not the behaviour you're trying to avoid
Fadeable — As students become fluent, the reminder shrinks — from a full sentence to a gesture to nothing at all
An Instructional Strategy, Not a Behavioural One — It uses the same logic as teaching an academic skill: identify the error, teach the correct response, prompt it in advance
Hard Thinking for Everyone
💻 Free Webinar 📅 15 August
In this session, Jamie explores three core strategies for maximising hard thinking by deliberately sampling student thinking at three levels: Everyone, Together, and Anyone (ETA).
Why Does Precorrection Matter?
Most classroom management advice normally focuses on what to do after something goes wrong: how to respond, what consequence to apply, or how to de-escalate. Colvin, Sugai, and Patching (1993) argue that we should spend just as much attention on what happens beforehand.
The research illustrates the impact of this difference. In one case, a student repeatedly entered the classroom noisily after recess. Each day, the teacher responded with the same correction and increasingly severe consequences, yet the behaviour persisted. In contrast, when teachers anticipated a predictable error or behaviour and provided guidance before it occurred, students were far more likely to respond successfully. The key difference was not the student—it was the timing of the intervention.
“Correction procedures are consequent manipulations designed to signal and stop inappropriate behavior after it occurs, while precorrection procedures are antecedent manipulations designed to prevent the occurrence of predictable inappropriate behavior.”
This isn't just a theoretical claim. Colvin, Sugai, Good, and Lee (1997) took the idea into a real elementary school and tested it school-wide, across the building entrance, the walk to the cafeteria, and the exit at the end of the day — three of the most predictable trouble spots in any school day. Where staff increased their use of precorrection alongside active supervision, problem behaviour in those settings fell noticeably. More recently, Moore et al. (2018) found the same pattern held at a much smaller scale — a brief verbal or visual reminder given just before class, used with individual students in ordinary classrooms, improved behaviour for every student in the study, and both teachers and students said they'd want to keep using it.
👉 Read the edition on Behavioural Leadership for more on building proactive, instructional approaches to classroom behaviour
What connects these studies is the same underlying mechanism: attention shifts from managing behaviour after it derails a lesson, to preventing the derailment in the first place. Precorrection doesn't work in isolation. It sits in a healthy classroom culture made up of clear expectations, consistent routines, that are used deliberately.
🎬 Check out the latest DistillED Explainer video on Environment below.
How Do I Use Precorrection?
Precorrection isn't a single reminder — Colvin, Sugai, and Patching (1993) set it out as a seven-step sequence, moving from noticing a pattern through to checking whether the plan actually worked. I've tightened it to five steps below, but the thinking underneath is theirs: most of the work happens once, before you ever say a word to students.
Step | Explanation | Example |
|---|---|---|
1. Spot the Pattern
| Look for the context that reliably sets the behaviour off — a task, a transition, a seating arrangement, a time of day. Colvin, Sugai, and Patching call this a functional analysis: noting what happens right before the behaviour and right after it, so you're responding to a genuine pattern rather than a guess. | A Year 4 teacher keeps a mental note for a week: most days, the same three or four students walk in from break talking over each other, and it takes several minutes to settle the class before the lesson can start. That's the pattern worth acting on — not the odd bad day, but the predictable one. |
2. Name the Expected Behaviour
| Colvin, Sugai, and Patching set three tests for a good expected behaviour: it should be observable, incompatible with the problem behaviour (so the two genuinely can't happen at the same time), and a real replacement — something that gets the student what the old behaviour was getting them, not just a ban on it. | "Stop being so noisy" fails all three tests. The entry expectation instead becomes: "Walk in, go straight to your seat, and start the task on the board in silence." |
3. Adjust the Setup
| Context modification can mean seating, scheduling, or simply having a task ready on the board before students arrive. Colvin, Sugai, and Patching are explicit that this should stay as ordinary and unobtrusive as possible. | The teacher starts meeting students at the door after break and has a short entry task already projected on the board, so there's something to walk into rather than empty time to fill with noise. |
4. Rehearse and Prompt
| A rehearsal can be as brief as asking a student to state what's expected, given in the minute before the target moment rather than earlier in the day — Colvin, Sugai, and Patching's point is that timing matters more than length. Then, right at the point of entry into the trouble spot, a prompt — a word, a gesture, a point at the board — reinforces it once more, before anything has gone wrong. | Just before the bell for break, the teacher catches the group at the door: "Remind me — what are we doing the second you walk back through that door?" A few minutes later, as the first students reach the door, a quiet "straight to seats" and a point at the board reinforce it once more. |
5. Reinforce and Check
| The old behaviour has usually been reinforced, on and off, for months or years, so early attempts at the new one need deliberately strong, specific praise to have any real chance of competing — this is the step most teachers under-use, because it looks unnecessary once a behaviour has technically been taught. | "Row two — every single one of you walked straight to your seat and started writing. That's exactly it." A week later, the teacher notices the class is settled inside a minute most days, and starts dropping the spoken reminder in favour of just pointing at the board. |
As the expected behaviour becomes the normal behaviour, the reminder should shrink from a full sentence, to a gesture, to nothing at all. If you're still precorrecting the same moment six months from now, the pattern probably needs a different kind of attention.
The goal isn't a classroom full of reminders. It's a classroom where the moments that used to go wrong quietly stop needing them.
— Jamie
If you want more:
👉 Read Classroom Transitions — where precorrection first appeared in DistillED, as one of four techniques for smoother movement between activities
👉 Read Behavioural Leadership — proactive, instructional approaches to classroom behaviour more broadly
👉 Read Solid Entry Routines — designing the lesson start so learning begins from the moment students cross the threshold
👉 Get the Attention and Classroom Culture CPD Collection — a complete CPD pack covering attention, routines, and the classroom culture precorrection depends on
👉 Get the Participation and Thinking CPD Collection — for building the proactive, whole-class habits that make individual precorrections less necessary over time
👉 Get the DistillED Playbooks — practical, evidence-informed implementation guides for classroom culture, routines, and teaching practice
📥 Free Planning Tool
Precorrection Planning Tool
To help you put this into practice immediately, download the Precorrection Planning Tool — a simple, classroom-ready template that guides you through the five steps of planning a precorrection: spotting the pattern, naming the expected behaviour, adjusting the setup, rehearsing and prompting, and reinforcing and checking. With space to plan each step and consider how support will be faded over time, it can be used individually, in coaching conversations, or during team PD.
⚗️DistillED+ Exclusive Member’s Content
This week, ⚗️DistillED+ members get access to a Precorrection CPD PowerPoint, a Printable Precorrection Checklist, and a set of worked examples for common trouble spots — breaking down how to build a precorrection plan for your own classroom, step by step.
